Wednesday, January 31, 2007

What, me neo-orthodox?

Karl Barth must have been a great guy to agree with me...

Thanks for the link, fr'nklin!

You scored as Neo orthodox. You are neo-orthodox. You reject the human-centredness and scepticism of liberal theology, but neither do you go to the other extreme and make the Bible the central issue for faith. You believe that Christ is God's most important revelation to humanity, and the Trinity is hugely important in your theology. The Bible is also important because it points us to the revelation of Christ. You are influenced by Karl Barth and P T Forsyth.

Neo orthodox


64%

Emergent/Postmodern


61%

Evangelical Holiness/Wesleyan


57%

Fundamentalist


50%

Charismatic/Pentecostal


43%

Reformed Evangelical


43%

Roman Catholic


43%

Classical Liberal


32%

Modern Liberal


7%

What's your theological worldview?
created with QuizFarm.com

Let it snow! Let it snow! Watch them mock?

Growing up in the Greater Washington, DC Metropolitan Area, Northern Virginia division, I have seen my share of snow. Having lived in the frozen tundra of Southeastern Wisconsin, the Halfway-Between-Milwaukee-And-Chicago division for 9 months (the 9 months that took us right through the snowy season of late October through February), I have seen LOTS of snow.

But, I no longer live in the frozen tundra. I don't even live in DC. I live in Charlotte, North Carolina. And nothing says Charlotte, NC quite like a snow storm.

Okay, nothing says Charlotte, NC like "NASCAR", but work with me a little.

Tomorrow, we are scheduled to get a whopping 1-2 inches of snow. That doesn't aggravate me. I like snow. I thought Wisconsin was awesome in the winter. What it means is that Charlotte will get national attention. There is nothing that the city of Charlotte loves quite like national attention. National attention is better still if it involves the forthcoming NASCAR Hall of Fame. But this kind of national attention is not welcome.

I saw this national attention while sipping some exceedingly bad coffee in the lobby of the Comfort Inn in San Jose, CA two weeks ago tomorrow. CNN was on the tube, and they were broadcasting live from Charlotte. The reporter was standing beside what looked like an overpass or road overlooking 485 and talking about the big, bad ice storm that had occurred in the night. He was scratching a patch off of a railing and saying something along the lines of, "all it took was this much ice to close the city down! " No wonder they hate Yankees in the South. All that was missing was for the reporter to talk about how superior they are in New York, Philadelphia, or, heaven help us,
Boston.

Yes, that's right. Tomorrow Charlotte and all points in the south that are affected by the oncoming storm will be mocked on the national news: "Stupid southerners can't drive in the stuff." "What a bunch of wimps." Yada, yada, yada.

I gained my first hatred of this attitude growing up in Northern VA, where every time it would snow, the reporters would head out to either Dulles or National (back before it was Reagan National) Airport to interview...you got it, the same goofballs that will be mocking us tomorrow.

Nothing is as annoying as someone with a Boston accent talking about how people "down he-ah" can't operate their "cahs" in the snow, and how New England is so much better because their kids go to school when there's a foot of snow on the ground and they even walk uphill both ways in it and anyone that can’t take it is obviously backwards and they’re so superior that they are going to move to the south as soon as possible to show these backwoods hicks just how to do things.

And so, they move south—trust me, Charlotte is a lot like DC: most people are from somewhere else, and usually from the north—and they then discover that it isn’t the people that can’t handle it. It’s an infrastructure thing. This will be the first snow in three years. You think an area that gets that much snow has hundreds of snow plows at its beck and call?

Now, Wisconsin had the tools. I lived in a town of 3000ish people (literally a village), and I swear they had 5-10 snow plows. Not only that, but before the first flake hit the ground, they were a-plowin’. And not just the main roads, either. No sir, this was a first rate snow removal machine, I’ll tell you what! But, you wanna know a secret? Lean closer and I’ll whisper it to you:

Those folks can’t get their tires to work on snow and ice any better than those of us that reside in the South.

See, one day, I was at work, and the snow came. And in Wisconsin, there is no such thing as a wimpy snow. In an hour they could have an inch or two. But I digress…we were house-sitting for my wife’s cousin, and I was even using their car. Then I started getting the comments: “If you need to get home, go ahead.” “Brad, you drive through snow before?” Even my lovely wife called with, “Be careful, please. The snow here is different than Virginia.” Grrrr.

Deciding it would be wise to hit the main roads, I headed straight to I-94. And guess what I saw? Cars in ditches. Cars spun the wrong way beside the road. Cars abandoned by drivers driven to madness by the mysterious white flakes falling from the sky. And what did the license plates say? Virginia? North Carolina, the "First in Flight"? Florida, the "Sunshine State"?

Nope. Wisconsin. But even more satisfying to me, Illinois, the "Land of Lincoln". Lots of Land of Lincoln-branded plates. Yes, the southerner in me gave a wry grin as I successfully made my way to a hot meal in a warm, cozy home.

So, before you start laughing at the smug CNN reporters tomorrow because "the people there just can't handle it," consider this post as a caution...pride cometh before the fall. And next time I'm in Boston, I won't brag about the fact that the roads we have above ground in Charlotte have yet to crush a single "cah".

Tuesday, January 30, 2007

When pop culture goes wild

I am a fan of U2. I like their music. Like all good music, theirs touches something intangible inside me. I'll even go so far as to say that I feel a certain spiritual connection to God because of some of the lyrics that have been penned by Bono, Edge, Adam, and Larry.

Now I'll up the ante by saying that, unlike other pop stars with a cause, Bono doesn't drive me crazy with his zeal to save Africa. I'll even go so far as to say that I'm more of a bleeding heart than ever due to his appeals to care for the poor in a faraway land. I might go further by saying that I admire him. He has used the message of Jesus to point out to the Church where we have failed those that Christ came to save and serve.

But, I am grounded enough to know that there is a time and a place to listen and dance to the music of U2, and church isn't it. I know, I know, I'm old fashioned, but I think that the "U2-charist" being celebrated by Episcopalians in the US and Anglicans in Canada and the UK is... well, inappropriate. I would be more harsh, but I think this word sums it up.

When I first heard of this about a year or so ago, it was being used as a way to "reach out" to non-Christians and others that are disaffected by the church. The problem is that efforts by men to make the Gospel "hip" will always fail. The Gospel isn't hip--it's offensive. It steps on toes. It enters those places in our lives that we would rather leave alone and moves stuff around. Sometimes it asks things of us that we find hard to do. As Jesus told Peter, it will "dress you and lead you where you do not want to go."

This service points in a different direction: toward the "if it's relevant to you, then it's relevant" aesthetic that is slowly but surely beginning to poison the minds even of the redeemed. It's also ironic: the Anglican Church started championing this trend partly to raise awareness of the plight of the poor in Africa--all while this same denomination is currently in danger of fracturing its fellowship with its adherents in Africa due to its toleration in the US over the ordination of at least one openly homosexual bishop.

Don't get me wrong, I have read statements by Bono that indicate a genuine faith in Christ, and I think it's a good thing that churches in the West (the USA in particular) become more aware of the poor among us in this world. I applaud churches such as Willow Creek in Chicago that even gave Bono a forum during their leadership conference last year to talk about this important issue. But that isn't worship. Worship is separate--communion in particular. We don't come to the table to celebrate our love of U2, but to celebrate our Savior and His sacrifice for our sins. As much as I love U2, they and their music pales in comparison to Christ. I think Bono would agree.

Wednesday, January 24, 2007

Sly as a fox and strong as a "bertsch"

He's not a tree, but a man. But no mere man. Nay, more beast than man. Regardless of what he is or what he is not, he demanded more consistency in my posting, and more posting is what he will get. It's just the way he rolls.

Saturday, January 06, 2007

Venice, the leaning tower of Pisa, and Charlotte's light rail

My pastor's wife, Beth, just called and we had the ensuing conversation:
Brad: "Hello?"
Beth: "Brad! I'm so glad you answered!"
Brad: "Well, I'm glad you called!"
(Laughter because of my great wit and outstanding timing)
Beth: "I have a question for you..."
Brad: "Okay..."
Beth: "Why did they build Venice on water?"
I'm praying for her...